By Editor
A fresh turf war has erupted in Kano between the State Film Censorship Board and the Hisbah Board over the regulation of movie download centers. The Film Censorship Board insists it’s the sole authority, while Hisbah claims it’s tackling immorality.
The Hisbah Board had banned downloading services, citing concerns over pornographic content. But the Film Censorship Board argues that Hisbah overstepped its bounds, as regulation falls under its mandate.
Abdullahi Sani Sulaiman, spokesperson for the Film Censorship Board, emphasizes that Hisbah’s role is moral enforcement, not regulation. He insists any conditions or sanctions must come from the Film Censorship Board.
The dispute highlights tensions between the two bodies. Hisbah claims it’s curbing immorality, while the Film Censorship Board sees this as overreach. The outcome will determine who regulates the industry.
The Film Censorship Board’s stance suggests Hisbah should focus on moral guidance rather than enforcement. This could impact how download centers operate in Kano.
Hisbah’s ban aimed to curb obscene materials, but the Film Censorship Board argues this falls under its purview. The debate raises questions about who’s in charged.
The public is caught in the middle, with some supporting Hisbah’s efforts to curb immorality. Others see this as censorship.
The Film Censorship Board’s insistence on regulatory authority could lead to a showdown with Hisbah. The outcome will shape Kano’s media landscape.
About The Author
